Introduce clearAllStubsFromMemory#1503
Merged
Raibaz merged 2 commits intomockk:masterfrom Jan 20, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
I like this, the change LGTM, thanks! Would you please be able to add documentation about it in README.md? 🙏 |
Contributor
Author
|
@Raibaz Thanks for the feedback 🙏 The api table was updated as part of initial commit. Is there any specific thing you would like me to mention in it? |
Collaborator
|
Ah, you're right, I missed that in my latest review. Sorry 🙏 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Credits: @evgenru for the idea and good reproducer.
Fixes #1486 and #1420.
Allow consumers to clear
stubRepositorywith a public method.I thought of adding another boolean flag to
clearAllMocks()initially but that one is used for both JUnit4 + 5 extension, so didn't want to introduce more complexities. So I ended up just adding a new method instead so as to not touch any existing logic. @evgenru @Raibaz @oleksiyp let me know if you have any thoughts on this.