Skip to content

feat(linter): implement unicorn/import-style#19600

Draft
camc314 wants to merge 1 commit intoc/02-10-feat_linter_implement_typescript_method-signature-stylefrom
c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_unicorn_import-style
Draft

feat(linter): implement unicorn/import-style#19600
camc314 wants to merge 1 commit intoc/02-10-feat_linter_implement_typescript_method-signature-stylefrom
c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_unicorn_import-style

Conversation

@camc314
Copy link
Contributor

@camc314 camc314 commented Feb 21, 2026

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor Author

camc314 commented Feb 21, 2026

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 21, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 47 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 3 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_unicorn_import-style (fdddcd6) with c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_typescript_method-signature-style (971cefc)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 3 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_typescript_method-signature-style (78391e1) during the generation of this report, so 4406498 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_typescript_method-signature-style branch from 5f1cadb to 7d4947c Compare February 21, 2026 16:29
@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_unicorn_import-style branch from 3aff699 to 0e9fc56 Compare February 21, 2026 16:29
@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_typescript_method-signature-style branch from 33bc801 to c2c0f31 Compare February 21, 2026 16:37
@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_unicorn_import-style branch from 79292f5 to 990906c Compare February 21, 2026 16:37
@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_typescript_method-signature-style branch from c2c0f31 to 971cefc Compare February 21, 2026 17:30
@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_unicorn_import-style branch from 990906c to 6e9b63f Compare February 21, 2026 17:30
@camc314 camc314 self-assigned this Feb 21, 2026
@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_unicorn_import-style branch from 6e9b63f to fdddcd6 Compare February 22, 2026 17:33
@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/02-10-feat_linter_implement_typescript_method-signature-style branch from 971cefc to 78391e1 Compare February 22, 2026 17:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-linter Area - Linter C-enhancement Category - New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant